You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of model selection relating bird species richness to predictor variables using corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc)

From: The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China

Model K AICc ΔAICc wi Adjusted R2
Area + Distance + HD + Isolation1 6 − 78.60 0 0.3720 0.8190
Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation1 7 − 77.48 1.12 0.2125 0.8227
Area + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation1 7 − 75.87 2.73 0.0950 0.8148
Area + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1 7 − 75.54 3.06 0.0805 0.8131
Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation1 8 − 74.54 4.06 0.0489 0.8185
Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1 8 − 74.22 4.38 0.0416 0.8169
Area + Noise + Distance + HD 6 − 74.15 4.45 0.0402 0.7959
Area + Distance + HD 5 − 73.83 4.77 0.0343 0.7842
Area + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1 8 − 72.59 6.01 0.0184 0.8087
Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD 7 − 71.46 7.14 0.0105 0.7914
Area + SI + Distance + HD 6 − 71.32 7.28 0.0098 0.7796
Area + Noise + Distance + HD + Isolation2 7 − 71.13 7.47 0.0089 0.7895
Area + Noise + SI + Distance + HD + Isolation2 + Isolation1 9 − 71.03 7.57 0.0084 0.8122
Area + Distance + HD + Isolation2 6 − 70.97 7.63 0.0082 0.7775
  1. Models with ΔAICc < 10, number of estimable parameters (K), Akaike difference (ΔAICc), Akaike weight (wi) and adjusted R2 were listed. SI = Shape Index; HD = Habitat Diversity. All candidate models were listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. See Table 1 for the abbreviated variables